https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104844 The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue's and the assessee's Requests for Order Modification (ROM) as they did not demonstrate any clear errors of fact or law necessitating rectification. The Tribunal reiterated that ROM is limited to correcting mistakes apparent on the face of the record, emphasizing that mere disagreement with previous decisions does not justify ROM. The Tribunal upheld its previous decisions, stating that issues raised had already been considered and rejected with detailed reasoning, leading to the dismissal of both ROM applications. en-us Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:27:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104844 The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue's and the assessee's Requests for Order Modification (ROM) as they did not demonstrate any clear errors of fact or law necessitating rectification. The Tribunal reiterated that ROM is limited to correcting mistakes apparent on the face of the record, emphasizing that mere disagreement with previous decisions does not justify ROM. The Tribunal upheld its previous decisions, stating that issues raised had already been considered and rejected with detailed reasoning, leading to the dismissal of both ROM applications. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104844