Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2001 (3) TMI 816

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he order dated 22nd December, 1994 passed by the learned CIT(A)-IV, Baroda. The only point of dispute as projected in the various grounds of appeal is that the Departmental Authorities have wrongly made an addition of Rs. 2,12,000 on account of alleged unexplained investment in shares of the assessee-company in the names of the following persons : 1.Shri Bhupesh C. ParikhRs. 50,000 2.Shri Ramesh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cer required the assessee to furnish the names and addresses of all the persons who held shares of the assessee-company having the face value exceeding Rs. 20,000 and the assessee complied with the requirements of the Assessing Officer. It was submitted that it appears that the Assessing Officer wrote letters to the above referred 8 parties to obtain a confirmation from them in respect of investme....