TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal allowed against addition for unexplained investment in shares</h1> <h3>Rinki Petrochemicals & Industries Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax</h3> The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A)-IV, Baroda, which wrongly made an addition of Rs. ... Unexplained investments The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A)-IV, Baroda, which wrongly made an addition of Rs. 2,12,000 on account of alleged unexplained investment in shares of the assessee-company. The Tribunal held that the investment in shares by certain individuals cannot be considered undisclosed income based on the Supreme Court decision in the case of CIT v. Steller Investment Ltd. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
