Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (1) TMI 653

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(Oral)]. -  The above matter has been listed for drawing statement of facts and for referring the same to Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Madras in terms of direction given in respect of Final Order No. 3007/1999, dated 29-11-99 [2001 (137) E.L.T. 1188 (T)] in R.C.P. 5 of 2000, dated 10-1-2001. The High Court has also drawn the following question for answering the same by drawing state....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... definition of capital goods as appearing in the explanation to Rule 57O of Central Excise Rules, 1944; (b)     For which no declaration was filed before the receipt of the capital goods into the factory of the assessee. The declaration required under Rule 57T(1) was filed subsequently after the receipt of the said goods into the factory; (c)     ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Rule 57U of Central Excise Rules, 1944 and why penalty should not be imposed. 4. After due adjudication, ld. Asstt. Commissioner by his Order-in-Original No. 448/95, dated 27-12-95 partly allowed their pleas. However, he disallowed the credit of Rs. 50,935.33 under Rule 57U of C.E. Rules and imposed penalty of Rs. 750/-. 5. Aggrieved with the said order, appeals were filed before t....