Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2002 (1) TMI 653

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....been listed for drawing statement of facts and for referring the same to Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Madras in terms of direction given in respect of Final Order No. 3007/1999, dated 29-11-99 [2001 (137) E.L.T. 1188 (T)] in R.C.P. 5 of 2000, dated 10-1-2001. The High Court has also drawn the following question for answering the same by drawing statement of facts together with required mate....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....explanation to Rule 57O of Central Excise Rules, 1944; (b)     For which no declaration was filed before the receipt of the capital goods into the factory of the assessee. The declaration required under Rule 57T(1) was filed subsequently after the receipt of the said goods into the factory; (c)      On the basis of invoices wherein it has been indicat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ould not be imposed. 4. After due adjudication, ld. Asstt. Commissioner by his Order-in-Original No. 448/95, dated 27-12-95 partly allowed their pleas. However, he disallowed the credit of Rs. 50,935.33 under Rule 57U of C.E. Rules and imposed penalty of Rs. 750/-. 5. Aggrieved with the said order, appeals were filed before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Commissioner took up three app....