https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101286 The Tribunal directed preparation and transmission of the statement of facts and supporting material to the Madras High Court for determination of whether goods treated by the Tribunal as capital goods could validly fall within the definition of capital goods under the Explanation to Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The reference was confined to that statutory classification issue, and the Tribunal complied with the earlier direction dated 10-1-2001 by forwarding the matter for the High Court's answer. en-us Fri, 04 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:43:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101286 The Tribunal directed preparation and transmission of the statement of facts and supporting material to the Madras High Court for determination of whether goods treated by the Tribunal as capital goods could validly fall within the definition of capital goods under the Explanation to Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The reference was confined to that statutory classification issue, and the Tribunal complied with the earlier direction dated 10-1-2001 by forwarding the matter for the High Court's answer. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 04 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101286