2001 (7) TMI 411

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....anter Kumar, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order]. -  This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. 32 (KDT) CED/JPR-I/99, dated 15-7-1999 of the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Jaipur. The facts of the case are that the appellant is a manufacturer of motor vehicle chassis. They took Modvat of over Rs. 12,000/- in respect of 2 purchases of inputs made by them in December ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for hearing today, the representative of the appellant, Shri M.R. Srivastava, Asstt. Manager, submitted that what was involved in the present case is the implementation of an order passed in their favour by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the lower authorities were in error in rejecting their claim on the ground that the claim was time barred. Heard the ld. DR also. 3. It is clear from the ....