<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 411 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96453</link>
    <description>A claim for Modvat credit based on an earlier appellate order could not be recharacterised as a fresh refund claim, because the entitlement had already been ? conclusively determined and the later application was only for implementation of that order. Treating the request as time-barred was therefore incorrect, as limitation did not apply to deny a benefit already recognised in appeal. The denial of Modvat credit was set aside, and the assessee was held entitled to take the credit and intimate the jurisdictional authority accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:45:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 411 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96453</link>
      <description>A claim for Modvat credit based on an earlier appellate order could not be recharacterised as a fresh refund claim, because the entitlement had already been ? conclusively determined and the later application was only for implementation of that order. Treating the request as time-barred was therefore incorrect, as limitation did not apply to deny a benefit already recognised in appeal. The denial of Modvat credit was set aside, and the assessee was held entitled to take the credit and intimate the jurisdictional authority accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>