2001 (2) TMI 368

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondent. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. - Arguing the ROM application, Shri P.N. Awasthi, ld. Advocate submits that while deciding the issue, the applicant was not heard. He submits that the case was decided in the absence of Counsel of the appellant as no notice of hearing was served on that day. We have checked our records. We find that the notice was sent to the applicant. We....