<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 368 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95488</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi rejected the ROM application as there was no mistake in the impugned order, which was based on an Apex Court decision. The rejection was upheld, emphasizing that reviewing the order would not impact cases decided prior to that date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:53:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 368 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95488</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi rejected the ROM application as there was no mistake in the impugned order, which was based on an Apex Court decision. The rejection was upheld, emphasizing that reviewing the order would not impact cases decided prior to that date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>