AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1999 (7) TMI 212
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Appellant. Shri G.B. Yadav, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - The question for determination in this appeal is whether the appellant was entitled to the benefit of Notification 262/86 with regard to fixed vegetable oil manufactured by it. 2. The notification exempts fixed vegetable oil falling under sub-heading 1503.10 of the Tariff duty subject ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... In the order impugned in the appeal, the Collector (Appeals) has confirmed the finding of the Assistant Collector that the benefit of the notification could not be available for the reason that the appellant had not shown that the oil was obtained by processed fixed oil extracted by solvent method. 3. The appellant had produced before the Assistant Collector a certificate dated 30-3-19....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on of solvent extraction method is unsupported by any basis. The order dated (sic) 16-32-89-SC, dated 29-3-1990 of the Ministry of Civil Supplies which is quoted in support seems to refer to the Excise Rebate Scheme and not to this notification. It is settled law that it is not permissible to read beyond the plain words of the notification to go into intention. [See Hemraj Govardhandas v. Union of....