https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92150 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, MUMBAI allowed the appeal, overturning the Collector (Appeals)'s decision denying the appellant the benefit of Notification 262/86 for fixed vegetable oil manufacturing. The Tribunal emphasized that the notification did not distinguish between imported or domestically manufactured unprocessed oil and found that the appellant had met the notification requirements. The Tribunal instructed the Assistant Commissioner to reassess the eligibility for a refund based on the evidence presented, indicating that the appellant had fulfilled the notification conditions in principle. en-us Fri, 09 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:36:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92150 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, MUMBAI allowed the appeal, overturning the Collector (Appeals)'s decision denying the appellant the benefit of Notification 262/86 for fixed vegetable oil manufacturing. The Tribunal emphasized that the notification did not distinguish between imported or domestically manufactured unprocessed oil and found that the appellant had met the notification requirements. The Tribunal instructed the Assistant Commissioner to reassess the eligibility for a refund based on the evidence presented, indicating that the appellant had fulfilled the notification conditions in principle. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 09 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92150