2009 (11) TMI 470

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....udicial Member - This is a stay petition filed by the appellants against confirmation of service tax demand of Rs. 3,20,597 for the services in the category of rent-a-cab and imposition of penalty of Rs. 6,41,194 under section 78 of Finance Act, 1994 and interest as appropriate under section 75 of Finance Act, 1994 and other penalties. The appellants were engaged in providing services of rent-a-ca....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Mahanagar Palika. On merits, it was pleaded that the case of the appellants is covered by the decision of Tribunal in the case of Kuldip Singh Gill v. CCE [2005] 2 STT 34 (New Delhi - CESTAT). He also submitted that Tribunal in case of Ganesh Maniyani v. CCE [2008] 12 STT 81 (Bang. - CESTAT), wherein unconditional stay was granted on similar facts. 3. On careful consideration of the submission ma....