https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78341 The Tribunal denied the stay petition against the service tax demand and penalty under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellants failed to establish a strong case in their favor despite citing financial hardship and referencing previous decisions. They were directed to pre-deposit 25% of the service tax demand within six weeks to continue with the appeal process. Failure to comply would lead to the dismissal of the appeal. The remaining amount of service tax, interest, and penalties would be stayed during the appeal's pendency upon the pre-deposit. en-us Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:03:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78341 The Tribunal denied the stay petition against the service tax demand and penalty under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellants failed to establish a strong case in their favor despite citing financial hardship and referencing previous decisions. They were directed to pre-deposit 25% of the service tax demand within six weeks to continue with the appeal process. Failure to comply would lead to the dismissal of the appeal. The remaining amount of service tax, interest, and penalties would be stayed during the appeal's pendency upon the pre-deposit. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78341