2009 (10) TMI 208

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ER Ch. Venkateshwara Rao for the Appellant. Ms. Sudha Koka for the Respondent. ORDER P. Karthikeyan, Technical Member - Vide the impugned order, the Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant M/s. Balasai Travels for their failure to comply with section 35F of the CE Act. 2. The original authority had confirmed a service tax of Rs. 5,93,032 found due from the appellant ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....heir appeal for their failure to make deposit under section 35F of the Act. He submits that the activity involved was provision of transport vehicles and not passenger vehicles. The service tax relatable to provision of passenger vehicle, under rent-a-cab operator scheme would be approximately Rs. 35,000. He offers to pre-deposit this amount. 4. We have also heard learned SDR who submits that in ....