<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 208 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76096</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by M/s. Balasai Travels was dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for non-compliance with section 35F of the CE Act. The service tax and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994 were confirmed, with a direction to pre-deposit Rs. 2,00,000. Despite the appellant&#039;s financial hardship, a pre-deposit of Rs. 35,000 was deemed sufficient for further appeal consideration. The case was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for additional proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 18:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 208 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76096</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by M/s. Balasai Travels was dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for non-compliance with section 35F of the CE Act. The service tax and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994 were confirmed, with a direction to pre-deposit Rs. 2,00,000. Despite the appellant&#039;s financial hardship, a pre-deposit of Rs. 35,000 was deemed sufficient for further appeal consideration. The case was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for additional proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>