Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1975 (11) TMI 61

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....m of Rs. 9,000 towards under-statement of cost of construction of the ground floor of the building situated at Devi Road and a sum of Rs. 5,000 towards unexplained investment in Dichpali Sendhlli Contractors firm wherein the appellant was admittedly a partner. The assessee challenged the two additions in the appeal before the AAC. In the course of appeal hearing. it was also urged that the levy of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by the AAC. Learned counsel for the assessee has contended that the sustenance of the addition of Rs. 7,500 was not justified in law, if the theory of intangible additions was kept in view by the AAC. It appeared that the additions made in the past five years amounted to about Rs. 22,000. Making allowance for the expenditure on the part of the assessee towards taxes etc. from the intangible addit....