Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1976 (3) TMI 82

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aler in coconuts. His business premises is in Palacol. He purchases coconuts from the agriculturists who bring the goods to the appellant's premises and take cash for them. Thus, for the purchase of the goods the assessee has to keep cash in his business premises. On 13th June, 1971 in this might the roof of the business premises was opened and a burglar removed cash to the extent of Rs. 5,840. Th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....owed. 4. We have considered the matter carefully. The decision relied on by the Departmental Representative appears to support their contention. In that case, a stranger came to the assessee's shop during the business hours and removed the cash without the knowledge of the assessee. The Tribunal allowed the claim and the High Court held that such loss did not spring directly from the assessee's b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....king into a house and the loss being that of a house owner and not inidental to business. They did not express any definite opinion about the correctness about this illustration but held that the observations would not be applicable in the case of banking company. The learned judges then proceeded to consider how far a loss caused by robbery or dacoity could be considered incidental to business. T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... when in the custody of the employee on the way to the bank. In my opinion the occasion for the loss of the present appellant was the operation of its business in the normal way, with the result that the cash was stolen on the premises at that particular time, and the possibility of such plunder constituted an attraction to a particular type of criminal, including both the safe-blower and the arme....