New Delhi, May 25 (PTI) The Supreme Court on Monday sought response from the Chhattisgarh government on a bail plea of businessman Anwar Dhebar in a case involving alleged corruption and illegal commission racket linked to the Chhattisgarh State Marketing Corporation Limited.

A bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi issued notice to the state government and sought reply by June 3.

The Chhattisgarh High Court on May 13 had rejected Dhebar's bail plea, saying the allegations indicated a "deeprooted and systematic corruption network" within the state-run corporation.

The HC held that economic offences involving public funds must be treated with greater seriousness.

The high court had observed that economic offences involving deep-rooted conspiracies and largescale loss of public money are grave crimes that affect the country’s economy as a whole.

It had noted that material collected during the investigation prima facie suggested that manpower supply agencies were allegedly compelled to pay illegal commissions to secure clearance of their legitimate bills and dues.

The case was registered by the Economic Offences Wing/Anti-Corruption Bureau under provisions of the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act.

According to the prosecution, a structured mechanism allegedly operated within CSMCL in which manpower agencies were forced to pay commissions for bill clearances, with the proceeds allegedly routed through intermediaries. PTI PKS SJK PKS DV DV

Corruption and illegal commission racket allegations shape bail proceedings linked to a state-run corporation. Bail proceedings concerned allegations of corruption and an illegal commission racket linked to the Chhattisgarh State Marketing Corporation Limited, where manpower agencies were allegedly forced to pay commissions for bill clearances through intermediaries. The prosecution case was registered by the Economic Offences Wing and Anti-Corruption Bureau under the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act. The High Court had declined bail, treating the matter as a deep-rooted corruption network involving public funds, and the Supreme Court sought the State's response on the bail plea.