1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tata Trusts should always be led by a Tata family member; current trustee disputes are viewed as routine but consequential.</h1> The author contends that Tata Trusts should always be headed by a Tata family member to perpetuate founders' goals, characterises current trustee disagreements over board appointments and governance as routine transition 'side shows,' and highlights that trustee infighting is significant because the trusts exert decisive influence over the conglomerate via about a 66% stake in the holding company, potentially affecting group functioning.