<h1>Regulator finds no prima facie violation of Sections 3 or 4 in developer's villa-project complaint; no dominance established</h1> The competition regulator dismissed a complaint alleging anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominance by a developer, its group firm, and government departments over a villa project in Gurugram. The complainant alleged the developer permitted non-villa construction on designated plots contrary to promotional materials and conveyance deeds, harming villa owners. The regulator found no prima facie violation of Sections 3 or 4 of the Competition Act, concluding the developer was not dominant in the relevant villa-development market given multiple competing major developers, and therefore there was no need to examine abuse-of-dominance allegations.