Bridgewater (US), Jul 13 (AP) NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte is set to meet President Donald Trump this week on the heels of the US leader announcing plans to sell NATO allies weaponry that it can then pass on to Ukraine.

NATO in a statement said Rutte will be in Washington on Monday and Tuesday and would meet with Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth as well as Congress. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the visit.

The visit comes as Trump last week teased that he would make a “major statement” on Russia on Monday and as Ukraine struggles to repel massive and complex air assaults launched by Russian forces.

Rubio said Friday that some of the US-made weapons that Ukraine is seeking are deployed with NATO allies in Europe. Those weapons could be transferred to Ukraine, with European countries buying replacements from the US, he said.

“It's a lot faster to move something, for example, from Germany to Ukraine than it is to order it from a (US) factory and get it there,” Rubio told reporters last week during visit to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

French Defence Minister Sebastien Lecornu in an interview published Sunday in La Tribune Dimanche said that European officials have been making the case to the Trump administration to bolster air defense capabilities with any coming packages.

He added that France is in a “capacity hole” and will have to wait until next year before being able to provide Ukraine new ground-air missiles.

Trump is also facing calls from Republicans and Democrats as well as European allies to support legislation in the Senate that aims to cripple Russia's oil industry and hit Moscow with US sanctions for its ongoing invasion of Ukraine.

The legislation, in part, calls for a 500 per cent tariff on goods imported from countries that continue to buy Russian oil, gas, uranium and other exports. It would have an enormous impact on economic behemoths China and India, which account for roughly 70 per cent of Russia's energy trade.

That revenue is critical in helping keep the Russian war machine humming as the US and Europe have imposed significant import and export bans on a wide range of goods to and from Russia, affecting sectors like finance, energy, transport, technology, and defence.

Trump for months had threatened, but held off on, imposing new sanctions against Russia's oil industry.

But the Republican leader has become increasingly exasperated with Putin in recent days and has laid into the Russian leader for prolonging the war.

“We get a lot of bull -- thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth,” Trump said last week in an exchange with reporters. “He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.” Congress has been prepared to act on the legislation, sponsored by Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Democrat Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, for some time.

The bill has overwhelming support in the Senate, but Republican leadership has been waiting for Trump to give the green light before moving ahead with it.

The White House had expressed some reservations about the legislation. Trump made clear he wants full authority over the waiver process to lift the sanctions, tariffs or other penalties, without having to cede control to Congress.

Under the initial bill, the president “may terminate” the penalties under certain circumstances, but immediately reimpose them if the violations resume. Graham has said the president would be allowed to waive the sanctions, for 180 days, and could also renew a waiver. (AP) PY PY

Presidential waiver authority over proposed tariffs on countries buying Russian energy may shape sanctions enforcement. President Trump is coordinating with NATO and US officials to allow NATO allies to transfer US-made weapons to Ukraine while purchasing replacements, addressing urgent air-defence gaps. Concurrent Senate legislation would impose tariffs on countries buying Russian energy to curtail revenue to Moscow; the bill contemplates presidential discretion to waive or renew penalties, raising executive-versus-legislative control issues.