1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Investigation agencies cannot summon lawyers without director approval after Supreme Court takes suo motu action</h1> The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu case regarding investigation agencies summoning lawyers who represent parties or provide legal opinions. This follows the Enforcement Directorate summoning senior advocates who advised a health insurance company. The agency subsequently directed officers not to issue summons to advocates in money laundering cases without director approval. Bar associations condemned this as undermining legal profession autonomy and threatening justice administration independence. The Court will examine whether investigating agencies can directly summon lawyers for questioning clients, or if judicial oversight is required for exceptional cases involving lawyers' expanded roles beyond legal advice.