1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Cricket administrator fails to force board to pay Rs 10.65 crore FEMA penalty through indemnification claim</h1> The Supreme Court dismissed a former cricket administrator's petition seeking to compel the cricket board to pay a penalty of Rs 10.65 crore imposed by the Enforcement Directorate for Foreign Exchange Management Act violations. The petitioner argued the board should indemnify him under bylaws from his tenure as vice president and league chairman. The Bombay High Court had previously rejected this petition as frivolous, imposing Rs 1 lakh costs, noting the board doesn't qualify as a state entity under constitutional provisions and cannot be compelled through writ jurisdiction for penalty indemnification matters.