1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Freedom of expression limited where comments hurt linguistic sentiments; apology could have averted film release unrest.</h1> The Karnataka High Court reprimanded Kamal Haasan for refusing to apologise for a remark that offended Kannada speakers, holding that freedom of expression does not extend to speech that hurts a linguistic community's cultural identity and that a single apology could have resolved the unrest. In a petition for police protection for the film's release, the court criticised seeking state protection for a situation created by the actor, noted commercial interests in the film, and recorded that the release in the state was postponed pending further hearing.