Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
1 | Income Tax - 2008 - TMI - 4036 - MADRAS HIGH COURT |
| Excise duty, sales tax & conversion charges will not be included in total turnover, while computing deduction u/s 80 HHC - whether expenses on replacement of machinery are revenue/capital expenditure will be determined by provisions of IT Act not on basis of accounting practice of assessee - they are revenue expenditure as entire plant & machinery are common unit - when no claim for depreciation was made before any authorities to consider question of block of assets no question of law arise |
|
|
2 | Income Tax - 2008 - TMI - 4035 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT |
| AO has to form his own opinion & record his satisfaction, of concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, before initiating penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - assessment was completed accepting the returned net income as per the revised return - both assessment order & SCN are silent about such satisfaction of AO - Nothing has been placed by Revenue to show that any other material was available with AO to confirm concealment - penalty set aside |
|
|
3 | Income Tax - 2008 - TMI - 4034 - DELHI HIGH COURT |
| Service charges paid by assessee to Electricity board for laying the service line for 4th unit - AO held that benefit derived by assessee was of an enduring nature so it is capital expenditure - Setting 4th unit is extension of existing business, not start of new business - held that service lines didn't belong to assessee but to Electricity board & were laid to enable assessee to conduct its business more efficiently - benefits are of commercial nature so they are revenue expenditure |
|
|
4 | Income Tax - 2008 - TMI - 4033 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT |
| Genuineness of the credit was doubted AO - considering the explanations furnished by assessee, AO vide its order of assessment held cash credits, to be not genuine and accordingly made additions - Merely because in some case the amount was also shown to have been returned does not prove that the transaction in question was genuine or bonafide - No explanation furnished as to why impugned persons have advanced amount to assessee without any interest - addition were justified |
|
|
5 | Income Tax - 2008 - TMI - 4032 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT |
| Cash credits - assessee had failed to discharge the burden which lay upon it to prove the genuineness of the credits shown in its account - therefore, it is not possible to agree with learned counsel that the Assessing Officer had illegally made additions to the income of the assessee - findings |
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.