Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 News - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Category: ?
Categorized by AI
---- All Categories ----
  • ---- All Categories ----
  • Income Tax
  • GST
  • Customs, DGFT & SEZ
  • FEMA & RBI
  • Corp. Laws, SEBI & IBC
  • PMLA, Black Money & ED
  • Budget
  • News and Press Release
  • PTI News
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      News
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      News

      Back

      All News

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        News

        Back

        All News

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        Kerala HC dismisses Cong MLA plea for probe against CM Vijayan on CMRL-Exalogic transactions

        March 28, 2025

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Kochi, Mar 28 (PTI) The Kerala High Court on Friday dismissed a plea by Congress MLA Mathew Kuzhalnadan seeking a probe against Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan over the alleged financial transactions between his daughter's now defunct IT firm and a private mining company.

        Kuzhalnadan had moved the High Court against a vigilance court order rejecting his plea for an investigation against Vijayan over the alleged financial transactions between the private mining company -- Cochin Minerals and Rutile Ltd (CMRL) -- and the IT firm -- Exalogic -- of his daughter T Veena.

        Justice K Babu dismissed the plea saying that the MLA "failed" to place before the vigilance court the facts constituting the offence of corruption alleged by him against the CM, his daughter and her IT firm.

        "In the given materials, the facts constituting the offences alleged for taking cognizance are not available," the High Court said, adding that the facts provided by the MLA "at the most triggered a suspicion".

        It also made clear that the dismissal of his plea does not preclude the MLA from filing a fresh complaint with adequate materials in future.

        The High Court also quashed the vigilance court's observation that Kuzhalnadan's plea was politically motivated, saying that it was a "premature" and "unwarranted" view.

        Along with Kuzhalnadan's revision petition, a similar plea by late social activist Gireesh Babu was also dismissed by the High Court.

        The activist died during pendency of his petition in the High Court and an amicus curiae was appointed to argue on his behalf.

        The dismissal of Kuzhalnadan's plea was welcomed by the ruling CPI(M) with its state secretary M V Govindan terming the MLA's petition as a "blank bullet".

        He said that it was an attempt by the "rainbow alliance", which includes the UDF and BJP, to create a smokescreen and attack the state government, Vijayan and his daughter.

        State Excise Minister M B Rajesh said the allegations by Kuzhalnadan were for media attention and to mislead the public.

        He said that the decision will not stop the UDF opposition from continuing to make the allegations.

        Leader of Opposition in the Assembly, V D Satheesan, said that a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act in connection with the same issue was being investigated by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) and therefore, it was not a setback for the UDF.

        The Congress has been targeting the chief minister, his daughter, and the CPI(M) after a Malayalam daily reported that the CMRL had paid a total of Rs 1.72 crore to the CM's daughter between 2017 and 2020.

        The report cited the ruling of an interim board for settlement and said that the CMRL previously had an agreement with Veena's IT firm for consulting and software support services.

        It was also alleged that though no service was rendered by her firm, the amount was paid on a monthly basis "due to her relationship with a prominent person." PTI HMP HMP KH

        Insufficiency of evidence to support a corruption probe, leaving room for a fresh complaint with adequate material. The High Court held that the materials before the vigilance court did not establish facts sufficient to constitute the alleged offences and at most gave rise to suspicion, declining to take cognizance on that record while permitting the filing of a fresh complaint with adequate material; it also quashed a premature vigilance-court finding of political motivation.
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                            Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                                Insufficiency of evidence to support a corruption probe, leaving room for a fresh complaint with adequate material.

                                The High Court held that the materials before the vigilance court did not establish facts sufficient to constitute the alleged offences and at most gave rise to suspicion, declining to take cognizance on that record while permitting the filing of a fresh complaint with adequate material; it also quashed a premature vigilance-court finding of political motivation.





                                Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                                Topics

                                ActsIncome Tax
                                No Records Found