Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press Information Bureau
Government of India
Ministry of Coal
19-October-2012 13:46 IST
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has pressed upon for the need to improve the quality of XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) filings. In a letter sent to the Presidents of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) and the Institute of Company Secretary in India (ICSI) the ministry said it is the bounden duty of these institutes to improve the quality of XBRL filing for the financial year (FY) 2011-12 to be undertaken by its members. Further, the Institute may conduct further trainings, issue guidelines, etc so that such quality related issues are appropriately resolved.
As per the letter a random scrutiny of XBRL filing of financial statements by few companies to MCA for FY 2010-11 reveals significant variations in disclosures in published results and the XBRL filing due to ‘incorrect’ mapping of disclosures. It has been observed that few disclosures were ‘mapped/ tagged’ with incorrect accounting concept despite availability of appropriate element in taxonomy. It has also been observed that provisions of “Block Text tagging” and/ or “Footnote” have been inappropriately used to report disclosures like subsidiary details, related party transactions, Director’s Report, etc. even when appropriate elements were available in the taxonomy for such disclosures.
Moreover, Such filing are inaccurate and do not adequately represent true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company as per Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956. Such XBRL filing, apart from being misleading, also dilute the effectiveness of XBRL, for stakeholders’ usage relating to the companies. It is unfortunate that professionals have certified the authenticity of such incorrect date, for which they are liable to be penalized. Such lapses defeat the very purpose of introducing XBRL filing which are meant to elicit more detailed and refined information as to the affairs of companies. Please note that XBRL filing are being minutely scrutinized to see if similar mistakes also appear in a larger sample.
It is note worthy that XBRL filing of financial statements by a select class of companies for FY 2010-11 was mandated vide Ministry of Corporate Affairs Notification GSR No: 748(E) dated 05.10.2011. The e-forms were duly certified by CA/CS/CWA professionals for their completeness and correctness in representation with respect to audited financial statement of the company.
*******
ST/-
Professional liability for certified XBRL filings stressed; improve mapping, tagging and training to ensure accurate financial reporting. Ministerial note identifies systemic XBRL filing defects-incorrect taxonomy mapping and misuse of block text/footnote tagging-resulting in filings that fail to present a true and fair view under Section 211. It directs professional institutes to provide training, issue guidance, and enhance oversight because certified filings by professionals have contained inaccuracies for which those professionals may be penalized; the ministry will intensify scrutiny and expects corrective action to ensure accurate, compliant e form certification.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.