1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Abuse of dominance results in penalty and cease-and-desist where a cable operator group denied broadcasters market access.</h1> Abuse of dominance under the Competition Act, 2002 was found where a multi system cable operator group, holding an overwhelming share of subscribers in Punjab and Chandigarh, denied a broadcaster transmission on its network, creating an effective denial of market access due to lack of substitutes. The Commission imposed a monetary penalty calculated as a percentage of average turnover for the preceding three years and required deposit within a prescribed period, together with directions to cease practices that deny market access; the findings followed an investigation on a broadcaster's information.