Loading...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
In M/s GUJARAT NRE COKE LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, RAJKOT [2012 (6) TMI 581 (Tri)] it is held that:
“…..when there is an excess payment of service tax, the same could be adjusted against the subsequent service tax liability is the law settled by the following decisions:
1. Powercell Battery India Ltd. - 2010 (3) TMI 357 (Tri)
2. Nirma Architects’s Valuers - 2005 (10) TMI 4 (Tri)
3. Aurore Trust - 2009 (9) TMI 189 (Tri)
4. Agrimas Chemicals Ltd. - 2008 (2) TMI 77 (Tri)
5. Narnolia Securities Pvt. Ltd. - 2008 (3) TMI 70 (Tri)
6. Bharti Cellular Ltd. - 2005 (6) TMI 8 (Tri)
7. Bayer Diagnostics India Ltd. - 2007 (4) TMI 124 (Tri)
8. Prachar Communications Ltd. - 2006 (3) TMI 35 (Tri)”