<h1>Court Rules Live-Streamed Transcripts Inadmissible as Evidence; Imposes Rs 2 Lakh Cost in Contempt Case</h1> The Gujarat High Court ruled that transcripts from live-streamed court proceedings cannot be used as evidence and suggested removing such videos from YouTube after a certain period. This decision came during a contempt case involving ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India Ltd. The court dismissed a contempt application by the Gujarat Operational Creditors Association, labeling it frivolous and ill-motivated, and imposed a Rs 2 lakh cost on the petitioner. The court emphasized that using live-streamed videos as evidence violates court rules and directed the removal of such content, leaving the decision to the Chief Justice's discretion.