Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Permissible limits on borrowings under Fiscal Consolidation roadmap needed to be equally applicable to Centre and States
Use of contemporary data on Population realistic, Balance between equity and efficiency needed
The permissible limits on borrowings under Fiscal Consolidation roadmap needed to be equally applicable to Centre and States in the context of overall macroeconomic framework, agreed the leading economists in a meeting with Fifteenth Finance Commission held here today. Economists further agreed that it would be realistic to use contemporary population data but weightage should be assigned to population and also rewards for population stabilization policy. It could be appropriately determined by the commission. Commission needs to balance equity with efficiency.
The Fifteenth Finance Commission continued its interaction with economists and domain experts today. Significant issues raised today included:
1. New context post abolition of Planning Commission which has altered the traditional system of resource allocation and consequently abolition of distinction between Plan and Non-Plan funds
2. Furthermore, issues of uncertainty pertaining to GST needed to be fully factored in.
3. Issues of rewards for past performance needed to be balanced with incentivizing future performance.
4. Inadequacy of data and its reliability constituted a significant handicap in realistic revenue projection and other key variables like employment as well as in determining measurable criteria.
5. The taxation capacity of states and any formula on devolution needed to be formed by equity, justice and uniformity.
6. While the TOR were broad ranging, the commission has significant latitude defining its own procedure of work under the Constitution.
7. There were several key challenges in making robust projections on GDP, pension liability, revenue realization and availability of resources beyond devolution for grants-in-aid.
8. State finances were stressed inter alia due to the behavior of Power Sector and implication of UDAY bonds on interest liability of states.
9. The future of Centrally Sponsored Schemes remained problematic with changing pattern of funding and a holistic view needs to be taken.
The Chairman summing the discussion felt that continued engagement with Domain Experts over the coming months will help commission in firming up the approach before reaching tentative conclusions both on the vertical and horizontal devolution of revenue. Besides an approach for local bodies and panchayats which were both realistic and would genuinely deliver the intended resources to the beneficiaries.
The Commission was chaired by N. K. Singh and other members were also present. Participants in today’s interaction included –
S.No | Name | Designation |
1 | Dr V Bhaskar | Retired IAS |
2 | Prof. Bharat Ramaswami | Professor, Indian Statistical Institute |
3 | Dr. Arvind Subramanian | Chief Economic Adviser, Ministry of Finance |
4 | Dr. Pronab Sen | Country Director, International Growth Center |
5 | Prof. Pami Dua | Professor, Delhi School of Economics |
6 | Prof. N.R. Bhanumurthy | Professor, NIPFP |
7 | Dr. Kirit Parikh | Chairman, IRADe |
8 | Dr. Indira Rajaraman | Economist |
9 | Dr. M. Govinda Rao | Emeritus Professor, NIPFP |
10 | Dr. D.K. Srivastava | Economist |
11 | Sh. T.N. Ninan | Chairman, Business Standard |
12 | Prof. Alakh N Sharma | Director, Institute for Human Development |
13 | Sh. Neelkanth Mishra | MD, Credit Suisse and India Equity Strategist |
14 | Dr. Arvind Virmani | Founder (Chintan) and President FSI |
15 | Dr. Sanjeev Gupta | Deputy Director,Fiscal Affairs Department, IMF |
16 | Dr. Pinaki Chakraborty | Professor, NIPFP |
17 | Dr. Surjit S. Bhalla | Part time Member of PMEAC |
18 | Dr. Shankar Acharya | Honorary Professor, ICRIER |
19 | Dr. Abhijit Sen | Economist |
First Meeting of the Advisory Council held
Later, Commission also held the first meeting with the Advisory Council to get inputs on various issues under the purview of the Commission. These included political economy behind the Centrally Sponsored Schemes, future of CSS, methods required for long term financing of schemes, stabilization of GST.
Limits on borrowings: equal application to Centre and States with population weighted incentives and equity efficiency balance. Permissible limits on borrowings under the Fiscal Consolidation roadmap should apply equally to Centre and States within an integrated macroeconomic framework, with contemporary population data weighted and rewards for population stabilization; the Commission must balance equity and efficiency in setting ceilings and incentives.Press 'Enter' after typing page number.