New Delhi, Apr 27 (PTI) The Supreme Court today extended till June 19 the parole of Sahara chief Subrata Roy with a warning that failure to meet the deadline of June 15 for the payment of ₹ 1,500 crore would land him in prison once again.

Roy, who in compliance with the last order appeared before the court, was told by the apex court that he has to frequently make the payment as per the roadmap approved by the court or face further imprisonment.

The Sahara chief gave an undertaking to a bench headed by Justice Dipak Misra that he would deposit ₹ 1,500 crore by June 15 and another payment of ₹ 552.22 crore by July 15 in the SEBI-Sahara account and filed an affidavit.

The apex court warned Roy that he may be sent to jail again if amount is not paid.

The bench, which also comprised Justices Ranjan Gogoi and A K Sikri, also ordered the arrest of Chennai-based Prakash Swamy, who failed to deposit ₹ 10 crore as per the last order. He will serve one month-jail for contempt of court.

Swamy had filed an affidavit on behalf a foreign firm expressing his intent to buy Sahara's New York-based hotel.

He had failed to comply with the apex court's direction to show his bonafide by depositing the amount in court to establish his intention to buy the property.

The bench allowed the Sahara group to make electronic payment through RTGS in the Sebi-Sahara account on or before June 15.

The apex court also asked Roy to remain personally present on June 19, the next date of hearing.

It asked the Official Liquidator of Bombay High Court to prepare terms and conditions for auctioning the Aamby Valley property for its approval on June 19.

Parole condition: failure to make court mandated payments by the stipulated deadlines will result in re imprisonment. Parole was extended subject to strict compliance with a court approved repayment roadmap: the principal must deposit funds into the SEBI Sahara account by the stipulated deadlines, may use electronic transfer (RTGS), and must appear personally at the next hearing; failure to comply will result in re imprisonment. The court also punished a third party for failing to deposit an ordered assurance amount and instructed the Official Liquidator to prepare auction terms for specified property.