Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
For proceedings after an assessee's death, the governing expression is legal representative, not legal heir, and it extends beyond succession-law heirs to persons representing or intermeddling with the estate. On that basis, service of notice on the petitioner in his declared representative capacity was valid, and he could not later challenge it merely because he was not a Class I heir. However, where reassessment was initiated by invoking the extended limitation period, sanction had to be obtained from the authority specified under Section 151(ii). Approval granted by the Principal Commissioner instead of the Principal Chief Commissioner did not satisfy the statutory requirement, so the reassessment notice was quashed for want of competent approval.
For proceedings after an assessee's death, the governing expression is legal representative, not legal heir, and it extends beyond succession-law heirs to persons representing or intermeddling with the estate. On that basis, service of notice on the petitioner in his declared representative capacity was valid, and he could not later challenge it merely because he was not a Class I heir. However, where reassessment was initiated by invoking the extended limitation period, sanction had to be obtained from the authority specified under Section 151(ii). Approval granted by the Principal Commissioner instead of the Principal Chief Commissioner did not satisfy the statutory requirement, so the reassessment notice was quashed for want of competent approval.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
