Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
All four imported products were classified as relays under CTI 8536 49 00 because their principal function was to control, protect and supervise electrical systems, and the added digital or monitoring features were only ancillary under the principal function test and trade parlance. Exemption under Notification No. 12/2012 was available to the three products with a contact rating of 5 amperes, as no contrary evidence showed them to exceed the 7-ampere limit; MICOM was excluded because its contact rating above 7 amperes was not disputed. Penalties under sections 114A, 114AA, 112 and 114AA were set aside since the demand failed for the three products and the duty and interest relating to MICOM had been paid before the show cause notice.
All four imported products were classified as relays under CTI 8536 49 00 because their principal function was to control, protect and supervise electrical systems, and the added digital or monitoring features were only ancillary under the principal function test and trade parlance. Exemption under Notification No. 12/2012 was available to the three products with a contact rating of 5 amperes, as no contrary evidence showed them to exceed the 7-ampere limit; MICOM was excluded because its contact rating above 7 amperes was not disputed. Penalties under sections 114A, 114AA, 112 and 114AA were set aside since the demand failed for the three products and the duty and interest relating to MICOM had been paid before the show cause notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.