Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A Section 7 application should not be rejected on maintainability without examining the real nature of the transaction where the materials disclose competing versions on whether the funds were a loan, a working-capital infusion, or a capital contribution. Entries in the corporate debtor's books showing the amount as long-term borrowing supported acknowledgment of debt, but the conflicting documents required fuller scrutiny, including the respondent's reply, before a decision on the nature of the debt could be made. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh consideration on merits, and capital contributions by directors or promoters were noted not to be retrospectively treated as financial debt without proper proof.
A Section 7 application should not be rejected on maintainability without examining the real nature of the transaction where the materials disclose competing versions on whether the funds were a loan, a working-capital infusion, or a capital contribution. Entries in the corporate debtor's books showing the amount as long-term borrowing supported acknowledgment of debt, but the conflicting documents required fuller scrutiny, including the respondent's reply, before a decision on the nature of the debt could be made. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh consideration on merits, and capital contributions by directors or promoters were noted not to be retrospectively treated as financial debt without proper proof.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.