Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A High Court considered a request to modify a bail condition requiring a security bond equal to the amount claimed. It held that the condition only required furnishing a security bond and did not require advance deposit of money or a bank guarantee, so the authorities cited by the applicant were inapplicable because the condition was materially different. The Court also held that it should not re-examine the issue after the same condition had already been challenged before the Supreme Court, and that withdrawing the condition would effectively amount to an impermissible review of the earlier bail order. The application was dismissed.
A High Court considered a request to modify a bail condition requiring a security bond equal to the amount claimed. It held that the condition only required furnishing a security bond and did not require advance deposit of money or a bank guarantee, so the authorities cited by the applicant were inapplicable because the condition was materially different. The Court also held that it should not re-examine the issue after the same condition had already been challenged before the Supreme Court, and that withdrawing the condition would effectively amount to an impermissible review of the earlier bail order. The application was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
