Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
641 to 660 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Corporate guarantee commission was allocated only in part where the guarantee to the foreign associated enterprise's lenders was jointly furnished by the assessee and its subsidiary; on that basis, only 0.25% was attributable to the assessee. Interest disallowance on borrowed capital was not sustained for non-interest-bearing advances to AAIPL because the advances were made in the course of the real estate business and the decision to waive interest was commercially expedient to protect business interests and principal exposure. The same commercial expediency principle applied to advances to SCA LLP after the assessee became the majority partner with management control, making the funding commercially driven and not a basis for disallowing corresponding interest.
Corporate guarantee commission was allocated only in part where the guarantee to the foreign associated enterprise's lenders was jointly furnished by the assessee and its subsidiary; on that basis, only 0.25% was attributable to the assessee. Interest disallowance on borrowed capital was not sustained for non-interest-bearing advances to AAIPL because the advances were made in the course of the real estate business and the decision to waive interest was commercially expedient to protect business interests and principal exposure. The same commercial expediency principle applied to advances to SCA LLP after the assessee became the majority partner with management control, making the funding commercially driven and not a basis for disallowing corresponding interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.