Clean slate principle extinguishes uncrystallised operational claims and bars continuation of pending recovery and arbitral proceedings after plan app...
Works contract classification governs composite layout-development contracts where VAT-paid goods are transferred alongside construction and infrastru...
Specified income tax exemption for pollution control body remains conditional on non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return filin...
Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
Penalty under section 270A for under-reporting or misreporting is valid only when the exact statutory limb under section 270A(2) is specifically identified in the notice and the penalty order. Where the Assessing Officer failed to specify the applicable clause, the foundation of the penalty proceedings was treated as defective. Relying on the jurisdictional High Court ruling in Schneider Electric South East Asia, the Tribunal treated the proceedings as bad in law, quashed the notice and penalty order, and deleted the penalty.
Penalty under section 270A for under-reporting or misreporting is valid only when the exact statutory limb under section 270A(2) is specifically identified in the notice and the penalty order. Where the Assessing Officer failed to specify the applicable clause, the foundation of the penalty proceedings was treated as defective. Relying on the jurisdictional High Court ruling in Schneider Electric South East Asia, the Tribunal treated the proceedings as bad in law, quashed the notice and penalty order, and deleted the penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.