Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell awa...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5081 to 5100 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under section 270A for under-reporting or misreporting is valid only when the exact statutory limb under section 270A(2) is specifically identified in the notice and the penalty order. Where the Assessing Officer failed to specify the applicable clause, the foundation of the penalty proceedings was treated as defective. Relying on the jurisdictional High Court ruling in Schneider Electric South East Asia, the Tribunal treated the proceedings as bad in law, quashed the notice and penalty order, and deleted the penalty.
Penalty under section 270A for under-reporting or misreporting is valid only when the exact statutory limb under section 270A(2) is specifically identified in the notice and the penalty order. Where the Assessing Officer failed to specify the applicable clause, the foundation of the penalty proceedings was treated as defective. Relying on the jurisdictional High Court ruling in Schneider Electric South East Asia, the Tribunal treated the proceedings as bad in law, quashed the notice and penalty order, and deleted the penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.