Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The Tribunal upheld deletion of section 68 additions for unsecured loans because the assessee produced confirmations, ledger accounts, income-tax returns, financial statements and bank statements showing identity, creditworthiness and genuineness, with receipts routed through banking channels and no rebuttal by the Revenue. It also accepted telescoping where the cash used for cheque-against-cash entries was linked to an already taxed on-money stream, so the related principal and interest additions did not survive. On disallowance of interest for diversion of borrowed funds, the Tribunal sustained only the reduced amount after finding no error in the appellate working of interest-free funds and advances.
The Tribunal upheld deletion of section 68 additions for unsecured loans because the assessee produced confirmations, ledger accounts, income-tax returns, financial statements and bank statements showing identity, creditworthiness and genuineness, with receipts routed through banking channels and no rebuttal by the Revenue. It also accepted telescoping where the cash used for cheque-against-cash entries was linked to an already taxed on-money stream, so the related principal and interest additions did not survive. On disallowance of interest for diversion of borrowed funds, the Tribunal sustained only the reduced amount after finding no error in the appellate working of interest-free funds and advances.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
