Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Duty on supply of M.S. scrap to an SEZ unit was held unsustainable because the statutory SEZ scheme displaced the customs duty levy; the duty demand was therefore set aside. As the underlying duty demand failed, the related interest also could not survive, and penalty under section 114, being consequential to the alleged duty liability, was likewise vacated. Penalty under section 114AA was also set aside because the show cause notice did not propose that penalty, so the appellant had no notice to meet that charge.
Duty on supply of M.S. scrap to an SEZ unit was held unsustainable because the statutory SEZ scheme displaced the customs duty levy; the duty demand was therefore set aside. As the underlying duty demand failed, the related interest also could not survive, and penalty under section 114, being consequential to the alleged duty liability, was likewise vacated. Penalty under section 114AA was also set aside because the show cause notice did not propose that penalty, so the appellant had no notice to meet that charge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.