Person chargeable with duty must be the importer at importation; subsequent purchasers cannot be held liable where beneficial owner rules did not appl...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5701 to 5720 of 96406 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Duty on supply of M.S. scrap to an SEZ unit was held unsustainable because the statutory SEZ scheme displaced the customs duty levy; the duty demand was therefore set aside. As the underlying duty demand failed, the related interest also could not survive, and penalty under section 114, being consequential to the alleged duty liability, was likewise vacated. Penalty under section 114AA was also set aside because the show cause notice did not propose that penalty, so the appellant had no notice to meet that charge.
Duty on supply of M.S. scrap to an SEZ unit was held unsustainable because the statutory SEZ scheme displaced the customs duty levy; the duty demand was therefore set aside. As the underlying duty demand failed, the related interest also could not survive, and penalty under section 114, being consequential to the alleged duty liability, was likewise vacated. Penalty under section 114AA was also set aside because the show cause notice did not propose that penalty, so the appellant had no notice to meet that charge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
