Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Duty on supply of M.S. scrap to an SEZ unit was held unsustainable because the statutory SEZ scheme displaced the customs duty levy; the duty demand was therefore set aside. As the underlying duty demand failed, the related interest also could not survive, and penalty under section 114, being consequential to the alleged duty liability, was likewise vacated. Penalty under section 114AA was also set aside because the show cause notice did not propose that penalty, so the appellant had no notice to meet that charge.
Duty on supply of M.S. scrap to an SEZ unit was held unsustainable because the statutory SEZ scheme displaced the customs duty levy; the duty demand was therefore set aside. As the underlying duty demand failed, the related interest also could not survive, and penalty under section 114, being consequential to the alleged duty liability, was likewise vacated. Penalty under section 114AA was also set aside because the show cause notice did not propose that penalty, so the appellant had no notice to meet that charge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
