Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Mixed iron ore consignments exported under final self-assessed shipping bills were to be treated as iron ore fines as a whole, and the higher rate for lumps could not be applied by splitting the cargo. For ad valorem export duty, the declared moisture content, Fe content and assessable value at the time of export had to be adopted; subsequent BRC-based realization figures could not replace the declared values. The Tribunal upheld invocation of the extended period and penalty because the declarations were found to be incorrect and material facts had been withheld, and remanded only for recomputation of any differential duty on that basis.
Mixed iron ore consignments exported under final self-assessed shipping bills were to be treated as iron ore fines as a whole, and the higher rate for lumps could not be applied by splitting the cargo. For ad valorem export duty, the declared moisture content, Fe content and assessable value at the time of export had to be adopted; subsequent BRC-based realization figures could not replace the declared values. The Tribunal upheld invocation of the extended period and penalty because the declarations were found to be incorrect and material facts had been withheld, and remanded only for recomputation of any differential duty on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.