Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Non-payment on the contractual due date constitutes a default under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and later adjustment of dues from cash collateral does not erase that historical default; it only affects the outstanding computation. The Appellate Tribunal noted that the Section 7 pleadings disclosed the facility documents, the missed payment, the subsequent recoupment from security, the loan recall notice, and the continuing liability. It held that the Adjudicating Authority erred in treating the application as defective for want of a correct default date or updated calculation. The rejection of the Section 7 application was set aside and the matter was restored for fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Non-payment on the contractual due date constitutes a default under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and later adjustment of dues from cash collateral does not erase that historical default; it only affects the outstanding computation. The Appellate Tribunal noted that the Section 7 pleadings disclosed the facility documents, the missed payment, the subsequent recoupment from security, the loan recall notice, and the continuing liability. It held that the Adjudicating Authority erred in treating the application as defective for want of a correct default date or updated calculation. The rejection of the Section 7 application was set aside and the matter was restored for fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
