Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Non-payment on the contractual due date constitutes a default under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and later adjustment of dues from cash collateral does not erase that historical default; it only affects the outstanding computation. The Appellate Tribunal noted that the Section 7 pleadings disclosed the facility documents, the missed payment, the subsequent recoupment from security, the loan recall notice, and the continuing liability. It held that the Adjudicating Authority erred in treating the application as defective for want of a correct default date or updated calculation. The rejection of the Section 7 application was set aside and the matter was restored for fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Non-payment on the contractual due date constitutes a default under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and later adjustment of dues from cash collateral does not erase that historical default; it only affects the outstanding computation. The Appellate Tribunal noted that the Section 7 pleadings disclosed the facility documents, the missed payment, the subsequent recoupment from security, the loan recall notice, and the continuing liability. It held that the Adjudicating Authority erred in treating the application as defective for want of a correct default date or updated calculation. The rejection of the Section 7 application was set aside and the matter was restored for fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
