Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
A subsidy received under the Jammu & Kashmir New Industrial Policy by way of GST/excise duty refund was treated as a capital receipt not chargeable to tax. The Tribunal noted that a claim raised only through a revised computation, and not in the return or a revised return, was not entertainable by the Assessing Officer. On merits, it examined the Industrial Policy dated 14.06.2002 and Notification No. 56/2002, applied the reasoning in Gravita Metal Inc., and found the refund incentive to be an exemption for a specified period rather than a revenue receipt. The appeal was allowed.
A subsidy received under the Jammu & Kashmir New Industrial Policy by way of GST/excise duty refund was treated as a capital receipt not chargeable to tax. The Tribunal noted that a claim raised only through a revised computation, and not in the return or a revised return, was not entertainable by the Assessing Officer. On merits, it examined the Industrial Policy dated 14.06.2002 and Notification No. 56/2002, applied the reasoning in Gravita Metal Inc., and found the refund incentive to be an exemption for a specified period rather than a revenue receipt. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
