Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
661 to 680 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A subsidy received under the Jammu & Kashmir New Industrial Policy by way of GST/excise duty refund was treated as a capital receipt not chargeable to tax. The Tribunal noted that a claim raised only through a revised computation, and not in the return or a revised return, was not entertainable by the Assessing Officer. On merits, it examined the Industrial Policy dated 14.06.2002 and Notification No. 56/2002, applied the reasoning in Gravita Metal Inc., and found the refund incentive to be an exemption for a specified period rather than a revenue receipt. The appeal was allowed.
A subsidy received under the Jammu & Kashmir New Industrial Policy by way of GST/excise duty refund was treated as a capital receipt not chargeable to tax. The Tribunal noted that a claim raised only through a revised computation, and not in the return or a revised return, was not entertainable by the Assessing Officer. On merits, it examined the Industrial Policy dated 14.06.2002 and Notification No. 56/2002, applied the reasoning in Gravita Metal Inc., and found the refund incentive to be an exemption for a specified period rather than a revenue receipt. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
