Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
A subsidy received under the Jammu & Kashmir New Industrial Policy by way of GST/excise duty refund was treated as a capital receipt not chargeable to tax. The Tribunal noted that a claim raised only through a revised computation, and not in the return or a revised return, was not entertainable by the Assessing Officer. On merits, it examined the Industrial Policy dated 14.06.2002 and Notification No. 56/2002, applied the reasoning in Gravita Metal Inc., and found the refund incentive to be an exemption for a specified period rather than a revenue receipt. The appeal was allowed.
A subsidy received under the Jammu & Kashmir New Industrial Policy by way of GST/excise duty refund was treated as a capital receipt not chargeable to tax. The Tribunal noted that a claim raised only through a revised computation, and not in the return or a revised return, was not entertainable by the Assessing Officer. On merits, it examined the Industrial Policy dated 14.06.2002 and Notification No. 56/2002, applied the reasoning in Gravita Metal Inc., and found the refund incentive to be an exemption for a specified period rather than a revenue receipt. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.