Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
A subsidy received under the Jammu & Kashmir New Industrial Policy by way of GST/excise duty refund was treated as a capital receipt not chargeable to tax. The Tribunal noted that a claim raised only through a revised computation, and not in the return or a revised return, was not entertainable by the Assessing Officer. On merits, it examined the Industrial Policy dated 14.06.2002 and Notification No. 56/2002, applied the reasoning in Gravita Metal Inc., and found the refund incentive to be an exemption for a specified period rather than a revenue receipt. The appeal was allowed.
A subsidy received under the Jammu & Kashmir New Industrial Policy by way of GST/excise duty refund was treated as a capital receipt not chargeable to tax. The Tribunal noted that a claim raised only through a revised computation, and not in the return or a revised return, was not entertainable by the Assessing Officer. On merits, it examined the Industrial Policy dated 14.06.2002 and Notification No. 56/2002, applied the reasoning in Gravita Metal Inc., and found the refund incentive to be an exemption for a specified period rather than a revenue receipt. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
